Image from Public Health Advocacy
website
The harmful
effects of cigarettes have been well documented, requiring them to have warning
labels on the package. With recent
studies revealing the harmful health effects, should soda also have a warning
label? New York State Assembly Member Jeffrey Dinowitz and state Senator
Gustavo Rivera believe so and have introduced legislation (Assembly Bill 2320-B& Senate Bill S 6435) requiring
that any sugar sweetened beverages sold in New York State have a warning labels.
The label
would state:
SAFETY
WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar contributes to obesity, diabetes
and tooth decay.
The label
would be affixed to any carbonated or noncarbonated sweetened nonalcoholic beverage
that has seventy-five calories or more per every twelve fluid ounces. Warning
labels would not be needed for beverages consisting of one hundred percent
natural fruit juice or natural vegetable juice that does not contain caloric
sweeteners. A larger sign/poster would be posted in places such as restaurants
and any establishment that dispenses sodas.
California
lawmakers tried to pass similar legislation (SB203) but the bill died in
committee in April 2015. CalBev, the California arm of the American BeverageAssociation, argued against the California bill by stating that soft drinks are
not “uniquely responsible for weight gain,” and added that affixing a warning
label would not change behaviors or teach people about healthy lifestyles.
But contrary
to what CalBev has stated, various studies have confirmed that a warning label for
soda is warranted. The California Center for Public Health Advocacy (CCPHA)
states in a factsheet, “An
overwhelming body of scientific research shows that liquid sugar is uniquely harmful
because it gets absorbed so quickly, and much faster than solid food. When
sugar floods the bloodstream, it overloads the pancreas and causes the liver to
store much of the sugar as fat – which leads to fatty liver disease. Both of
these conditions contribute directly to diabetes. Research shows that drinking one
or two cans of a soda a day increases the risk of developing diabetes by 26
percent.”
Nutrition
experts agree that sweetened beverages, such as soft drinks, energy drinks,
sweet teas and sports drinks, offer little or no nutritional value, and contain
large quantities of added sugars. A 20 ounce bottle of soda contains the
equivalent of approximately 17 teaspoons of sugar, whereas the American HeartAssociation recommends consuming no more than five to nine teaspoons of sugar daily.
In New York
City the harmful effects of soda consumption are more acute. Providing
testimony before the New York State Assembly
Standing Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection on April 13, 2015, Christine
Johnson, Assistant Commissioner of the Bureau of Chronic Disease Prevention and
Tobacco Control at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene stated,
“In New York City, 56% of adults are overweight or obese and over 10% have
diagnosed diabetes. Rates are even higher in New York City’s poorest communities,
which also bear a greater burden of chronic disease.
Nearly a
quarter of adults drink at least one sugary drink per day, and consumption
rates are nearly double in New York City’s lowest-income communities compared
to the highest-income communities, and over 40% of New York City public high
school students report drinking one or more sugary drinks daily. The proportion
of New Yorkers regularly consuming sugary drinks has declined in recent years;
however, these rates are still too high.”
A study
funded by the Healthy Eating ResearchProgram of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and conducted by University ofPennsylvania, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the University ofWaterloo asked 2381 parents to select a beverage from a simulated vending
machine containing a variety of were sweetened and unsweetened drinks. The study
revealed that those drinks with warning labels were three times as effective in
making parents less likely to purchase a sweetened beverage. The warning labels
also were effective among parents of varying educational backgrounds revealing
that not just the most educated parents read the labels, but all parents read
and considered the labels.
Assembly Bill 2320-B & Senate Bill S 6435 is
important. Having that warning on soda labels means that each time a consumer
goes to buy or drink that soda they would know of the danger to their health
and hopefully, would put that soda down.
We know, however, that getting these two bills passed will not be easy.
It will draw the ire and enormous money and power of the Soda Beverage industry
to defeat it. The Bronx Health REACH
Coalition knows how critical it is to reduce the overweight and obese epidemic
in the Bronx where 2 in 3 adults are
overweight or obese, and where 4 in 10 public school elementary students are
either obese or overweight. Efforts of our policy makers to make it easy for
residents to make healthy choices is extremely important.
Should warning labels be placed on
soda? Join in the conversation below.
No comments:
Post a Comment